Monday, October 21, 2013

Oil demand could reach peak, oil prices could fall

By Luis Fierro Carrión

(A Spanish version of this article was written for Revista Gestión of Ecuador)

For several decades, some environmentalists and critics of the oil industry have warned that oil production could reach a "peak", due to - supposedly - its over-exploitation and decrease in reserves.  This "peak oil" phenomenon, however, has never materialized, and production has been increasing steadily, from 15 million barrels per day (mbd) in 1950, to about 60 mbd in 1980, and 89 mbd today.  The increase in the supply has taken place at the same time that the international price of crude oil has risen, reaching historical records in recent years.

In recent months, however, some analysts and institutions have begun to warn that, to the contrary, what we seem to be approaching is a "peak demand" for oil, as the global use of hydrocarbons seems to have reached a maximum.  Citi, for example, estimates that the demand could reach a maximum of 92 mbd within a few years, an analysis that coincides with the auto parts manufacturer Ricardo, and with the British magazine The Economist.  Even BP, one of the main oil multinationals, estimates that demand growth will decelerate, and reach a maximum of 104 mbd towards 2030.  The OECD and the World Bank also foresee an eventual reduction in the demand, and, consequently, a fall in the price of oil.

The fall in oil demand responds to several trends.  One of them is the development of new sources of energy, including shale oil and gas in North America and other regions; the expansion in renewable energy, especially in Europe, Japan, and North America; and even investment in nuclear energy in China and the Middle East. The production of shale gas in the United States and Canada, in particular, could enable North America to become self-sufficient within a few years.

Another important factor is the increase in energy efficiency, in areas such as transportation (hybrid vehicles, electric cars, and other technologies); in industry, at home, etc.  

Growth is also slowing down in the emerging markets, particularly among some of the BRICS (in China, India, and Brasil), and these countries are also investing in energy efficiency, renewable energy, and in reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

The fall in demand and the increase in supply (both from crude oil and other energy sources) will probably lead to a substantial reduction in the international price of oil.

What can oil-exporting countries do to adapt to this scenario?  In general, they should have been investing the windfall revenues from the current high prices, through a sovereign investment fund (such as those in Norway or Kuwait), or directly in the generation of hydroelectric energy and other forms of renewable energy; as well as in the development of other sources of income. Another option is to expand the exploitation of natural gas, liquified petroleum gas, shale oil and gas, sand oil, and other sources of energy.  

Some oil exporters have very high subsidies on internal gasoline and gas consumption, which should be eliminated, or even reverted into a "carbon tax" (so as to discourage the over use of hydrocarbons, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and promote energy efficiency);  these energy subsidies also tend to be very regressive.

Monday, September 30, 2013

Ecuador was the country with lowest foreign direct investment in Latin America (as a % of the GDP)

Ecuador was the country with the lowest Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in Latin America
Summary of the article by Luis Fierro Carrión published in Revista Gestión, No. 229 (July / Aug 2013).
Ecuador was the country in Latin America and the Caribbean that received the least amount of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) as a proportion of GDP in 2012, according to a recent study by ECLAC.  According to this study (http://goo.gl/4QKKV), Ecuador received only 0.6 % of GDP as FDI, below countries such as Venezuela and Haiti.
In absolute terms, according to ECLAC, Ecuador received a total of $364 million in the period Jan.-Sept. 2012; according to more recent statistics by the Central Bank of Ecuador, the amount for all of 2012 was $586 million (http://goo.gl/WlMCq).  However, not all this amount represents new capital inflows.
According to the Central Bank, the new investments were only $227 milllion, whereas $ 300,6 million corresponded to reinvested profits, and $ 58.9 million to other capital (inter-company loans).  The preliminary data for 2012 reflect a reduction of 8.2 % with respect to 2011, and a reduction of 44 % in comparison to the amount reached in 2008 ($ 1,057 million).
ECLAC indicates in its report that the main countries of origin of FDI towards Ecuador were Mexico, CHina and Canada, and the main receiving sector was the exploitation of natural resources (oil and mines).
El Ecuador recibe menos inversión extranjera que Haití.
Por Luis Fierro Carrión
Edición No. 229 (Julio / Agosto 2013).
Sumario
El Ecuador fue el país de América Latina y el Caribe que menos inversión extranjera directa (IED) recibió en 2012, como porcentaje del PIB, de acuerdo a un rTabla-TC_229eciente estudio de la Cepal. En efecto, de acuerdo a la publicación (http://goo.gl/4QKKV), el Ecuador recibió apenas 0,6% de su PIB como IED, por debajo de países como Venezuela y Haití. En términos absolutos, de acuerdo a la Cepal, el Ecuador recibió un total de $ 364 millones en el período enero – septiembre 2012; conforme a estadísticas más recientes del Banco Central del Ecuador (BCE), el monto para todo 2012 se estima en $ 586 millones (http://goo.gl/WlMCq). Este total no sólo representa flujos de nuevo capital invertido.
De acuerdo a las estadísticas del BCE, las nuevas inversiones representarían $ 227 millones, en tanto que $ 300,6 millones serían utilidades reinvertidas y $ 58,9 millones, otro capital (préstamos entre compañías). Los datos preliminares de 2012 reflejarían una caída de 8,2% con respecto a 2011, y una caída de 44% con respecto al monto alcanzado en 2008 ($ 1.057 millones).
Según el informe de la Cepal, los principales países de origen de la iED en el Ecuador fueron México, China y Canadá, y la explotación de recursos naturales fue el principal sector al que se dirigió.

Millionaires of the world, unite! Millonarios del mundo, uníos

Millionaires of the world, unite!
Summary of an article by Luis Fierro Carrión published in Revista Gestión of Ecuador, August 2013
An interesting article on the distribution of wealth in the world, and the scandalous concentration of wealth in the hands of millionaires and billionaires:  there are 12 million millionaires in the world, who jointly hold a fortune valued at $46.2 trillion.
North America influenced in the increase of the world population of High Net Worth Individuals (HNWI) in 2012, with the highest growth rate (11.5 %), and reaching 3.73 million HNWI.  This displaced Asia Pacific to second place, with a growth rate of 9.4 %, and 3.68 millionaires.
The article includes details on the countries with the highest number of millionaires, the global distribution of wealth; the investment strategies followed by HNWI; the fiscal policies adopted in some of the OECD countries; and an overview of fiscal evasion at an international level.
Interesting facts:
• High net worth individuals or HNWI are those who have net assets or equity that they can invest, of at least US$ 1 million.
• Latin America's growth rate in millionaires slowed down, and it only grew by 4.4 % in  2012.
• Over 50% of the world's millionaires are in three countries:  USA, Japan and Germany.
• The global population of millionaires (12 million) is equivalent to 0.17 % of the population.
• Their participation in total world wealth (net assets) is 32,1%.
• During the first quarter of 2013, only 45,4% of these individuals trusted in financial markets.
• An excessive level of inequality, aside from being a problem from an ethical point of view, may also lead to growing social and political instability.
• Fiscal evasion is estimated at more than $100 billion in the USA.
Millonarios del mundo, uníos.
Por Luis Fierro Carrión
Revista Gestión, Edición 230 (Agosto / Septiembre 2013).
Sumario.
Un interesante artículo sobre la distribución de la riqueza en el mundo y escandalosa concentración en manos de millonarios y multimillonarios: hay 12 millones de millonarios en el mundo, quienes en conjunto tienen una fortuna valorada en $ 46,2 millones de millones (trillones en inglés, billones en castellano —se usa billones en el artículo—).
Norteamérica influyó en el aumento de la población mundial de los individuos de alto patrimonio (High NetWorth Individuals o HNWI), al registrar la tasa de crecimiento más alta (11,5%) y alcanzar los 3,73 millones de HNWI. De esta forma, la región volvió a tener la mayor cantidad de millonarios, superando a Asia Pacífico, que aumentó 9,4% y alcanzó los 3,68 millones de personas.
Incluye detalles sobre los países con mayor número de millonarios, la distribución global de la riqueza, estrategias de inversión de individuos de alto patrimonio y políticas fiscales adoptadas en algunos países, así como un panorama de la evasión fiscal a nivel internacional.
Eco-internac-interior-230
Datos de interés:
• High net worth individuals o HNWI (individuos de alto patrimonio) son aquellos que disponen de un patrimonio o activo neto susceptible de inversión de al menos $ 1 millón.
• Hay 12 millones de millonarios en el mundo.
• Tienen una fortuna valorada en $ 46,2 millones de millones.
• Norteamérica tiene 3,73 millones de individuos con alto patrimonio. Es la región con mayor número de millonarios.
• América Latina se ralentizó y creció solo 4,4% en 2012.
• Más de 50% de los millonarios del mundo está en tres países: EEUU, Japón y Alemania.
• La población global de millonarios (12 millones) es 0,17% de la población mundial.
• Su participación en la riqueza mundial (activos netos) es de 32,1%.
• Durante el primer trimestre de 2013, solo 45,4% de estos individuos confiaba en los mercados financieros.
• “Una excesiva desigualdad, aparte de ser problemática desde un punto de vista ético o moral, también puede conllevar mayor inestabilidad social y política”.
• La evasión tributaria se estima en al menos $ 100 mil millones en EEUU.

Wednesday, June 29, 2011

More CAPS stock picks

I thought I would share some more of my "Motley Fool" CAPS stock picks:

Weyerhaeuser Company (WY): High dividend, low P/E, growing sector. Have to watch the debt leverage, but otherwise seems undervalued.

First Solar (FSLR): Sunny future!

SanDisk Corp (SNDK): Low P/E, growing earnings, buying solid state memory technology.

Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. (ADR) (PBR): Low P/E, expanding reserves and production, high oil prices.

Infinera (INFN): Technological breakthroughs, low valuation.

CenturyLink, Inc. (CTL): Low P/E, high dividend, high cash flow.

Toyota Motor Corp (ADR) (TM): Eventually, will overcome earthquake and recall woes, and go back to being the most innovative and well run auto company in the world.

Activision Blizzard (ATVI): Fabulous portfolio of games. Moving into new media.

Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED): High dividend yield, stable yield, relatively low P/E.

Banco Santander Central Hispano SA (STD): Spain's public debt with respect to GDP is low. They are reducing the public deficit. Santander itself is expanding in Latin America and other markets..

Terra Nitrogen Company, L.P. (TNH): High dividend yield, low P/E. [you may be catching a trend here: I like high dividends and low P/Es!].

Hatteras Financial (HTS): Great yields, great growth, intelligent bet on ARM mortgages, what's not to like?

Chimera Investment (CIM): Despite its chimerical name, another company with an outstanding yield, low P/E, and obligated to pay out dividends.

Stratasys (SSYS): Huge growth potential in its revolutionary 3D printers (really, customizable micro-manufacturing plants).

Winnebago Industries, Inc. (WGO): Retiring baby boomers.

Aeropostale, Inc. (ARO): If some intelligent people picked it at $30, I guess there is not much risk in picking it at $17.

Claymore/AlphaShares China Small Cap ETF (HAO): investment in medium (small cap) enterprises in China, explosive growth potential. Also, currently undervalued.

Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO): Low P/E, good fundamentals, this stock will recover.

Most of these are beating the S&P 500 index since I picked them.

The usual disclaimers apply.

Tuesday, June 21, 2011

Highly Indebted Rich Countries (HIRC)

In the previous two decades, there was great concern about the "Highly Indebted Poor Countries" (HIPC), and great (and successful) efforts made to provide debt relief. This involved mostly low-income countries in Africa, Asia, and five countries in Latin America and the Caribbean (Bolivia, Guyana, Haiti, Honduras and Nicaragua).

Now, in contrast, the sovereign borrowers with highest levels of debt (with respect to GDP) are mostly advanced, industrialized, high-income countries.

The public debt to GDP ratio is highest in Japan (225.8 % of GDP in 2010), and among the top 20 are several OECD countries: Greece (142.8 % in 2010, and growing rapidly), Iceland (123.8 %), Italy (119 %), Belgium (96.8 %), Ireland (96.2 %), Portugal (93 %), Germany (83.2 %), France (81.7 %), and Hungary (79.6 %).

Also among the top 20 are some of the basket-cases, failing states (such as Zimbabwe, Lebanon, Sudan, and Nicaragua), and several Caribbean islands (Saint Kitts and Nevis, Jamaica, Dominica).

Of the PIIGS, only Spain does not make the HIRC list: a relatively respectful 60.1 % of GDP.

The United States comes in at 58.9 % (only including the Federal government); if you include all public debt, according to the IMF, it goes up to 92.7 %, which would land the USA at the 11th slot worldwide.

For the European Union as a whole, the average public debt is now at 82 % of GDP, compared with only 21 % for Latin America.

Obviously, this time around it will not be possible to provide debt relief to the HIRC (who would provide it?). Perhaps there will be some rescheduling in the worst cases (Greece, Ireland, Iceland, Portugal), or even a slight "haircut" for private sector bondholders. And I also expect a lot of real debt dilution through inflation.

Thursday, June 16, 2011

A few more stock picks

A few more of my stock and ETF picks on Motley Fool's CAPS.

I am currently ranked in the 75th percentile :-)

Ameresco (AMRC): It has fallen too far.

Honda (HMC): Eventually, Japan will overcome the blahs!

iShares MSCI Japan Index ETF(EWJ): Like I said, Japan will recover.

Costco (COST): It sells high quality goods and services at an unbeatable price. Seems like a good business model to me.

PowerShares Lux Nanotech ETF (PXN): It is the future. It has been underperforming.

Market Vectors LatAm Small-Cap Index ETF (LATM): Small cap sector tends to outperform, more so in the Latin American and Caribbean region, where access to capital is relatively scarce.

Resource Capital Corp. (RSO): Stable 14 % dividend.

The Procter & Gamble Company (PG): Solid fundamentals, solid dividends, solid market share, clearly undervalued.

T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (TROW): Got in early at Facebook, Groupon, Zynga, etc. It is our own DST (mail.ru).

Intel Corp (INTC): Growing dividends, piles of cash, recovery in IT. Plus, all the "tablets will replace PCs" arguments are way overblown.

iShares Silver Trust ETF (SLV): Metals vs. paper money, inflation coming up.

On the short side, Pandora (P) cannot keep the stratospheric IPO valuations with its current losses.

Some of the Internet 2.0 and social networks stocks deserve their rich valuations, others are obviously bubbling up.

Congratulations to Motley Fool Rule Breakers

Congratulations to Motley Fool's "Rule Breakers" newsletter for being the "number-one performer over the year to date through May according to the Hulbert Financial Digest, up 22.3%, versus 7.99 % for the dividend-reinvested Wilshire 5000 Total Stock Market Index".

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/car-ownership-and-market-timing-racket-2011-06-09

I have to say I have enjoyed (and profited) from being a subscriber for a couple of years now.

Their mutual funds are up 26 and 20 % since inception (FOOLX, TMFGX).

Kudos!

Friday, June 10, 2011

My top stock picks (and a comment on the movie Limitless)

I thought I would share with you my top picks in Motley Fools CAPS.

Overall, my rating is not too shabby, in the top third of all participants.

LIFE: This stock will resuscitate my IRA :-)

MVC: Venture capital is back.

IRBT: What can I say, robots are the wave of the future.

STP: Growing company in a growing industry in a growing country - what's not to like? Also, currently low P/E ratio.

VPRT: Up 40 % since I picked it in August 2010.

VITA: Well, now that it is being bought out, I guess my winning streak will end. Still, not bad (up 103 % since August 2010).

AKAM: This is an excellent long-term investment opportunity.

SRZ: Even though it has already increased 20-fold since I bought it, I think it still has room to grow.

ALU: It still has a long way to go back to its fundamentals level.

PBW: Solar energy is becoming competitive with gas-fired electricity. Enough said.

GOOG: They are great at everything they do (especially fostering innovation).

On another note, was I the only one that found it ridiculous that in the movie "Limitless", the main character, "Eddie Morra" (played by Bradley Cooper) suddenly is able to double his investments every day after taking a fictitious "smart designer drug". In essence, it would require that one individual (no matter how smart) can out-smart the entire market. Ludicrous!

Sunday, January 23, 2011

Best stocks in 2010 and 2011

My best performing stocks in 2010 (performance since they were bought) were:

SUNRISE SENIOR LIVING INC (SRZ), 2015 % (yes, a 20 bagger!).

CITIGROUP INC (C) (bought post Lehman Bros. crisis) + 130 %

FEDEX CORP (FDX) + 121 %

PANERA BREAD CO CL A (PNRA) + 114 %

UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORP (PANL) + 86 %

WHOLE FOODS MKT INC (WFMI) + 85 %

For 2011, my picks (that is, what I am buying now) are:

LIFE TECHNOLOGIES CORP. (LIFE)

NATIONAL GRID (NGG)

WISDOMTREE TRUST EUROPE SMCP D (DFE)

VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC COM (VZ) (mostly on the opening up of the iPhone to other carriers in the U.S.). However, Apple (AAPL) is still too rich for my taste, and will probably suffer with Steve Jobs leave of absence.

I also agree with some of Motley Fool's picks for 2011, in particular:

Altria Group (MO)
Dendreon (DNDN)
Gammon Gold (GRS)
Intuitive Surgical (ISRG)
Range Resources (RRC)
Valero Energy (VLO)

But definitely not Yahoo! (!)

Happy hunting!

Sunday, October 31, 2010

Impact of capital gains tax on U.S. investments

The reduced 15% tax rate on qualified dividends and long term capital gains is currently scheduled to expire on December 31, 2010.

Unless the U.S. Congress extends the reduction (which seems increasingly unlikely, given the lack of a bipartisan consensus on this and other tax reduction extensions), this means that in 2011, dividends will be taxed at the taxpayer's ordinary income tax rate, regardless of his or her tax bracket; and the long-term capital gains tax rate will be 20%.

All eyes will be on the lame-duck session of Congress after the November 2 elections. Even though President Obama and the Democrats have indicated this is one tax reduction they might consider extending (as well as the tax reduction for those earning less than $200,000, or $250,000 for couples filing jointly), it is possible that gridlock and partisanship will set in.

Thus, if you have been considering selling shares or other investments that have a considerable capital gain, it might be to your advantage to do this before December 31st.

There is a similar situation with the estate tax, which will jump from 0 % on Dec. 31st to 55 % on Jan. 1st, barring Congressional action. Other than emulating the plot of "Through your Momma off the train", the only option to get around this is through a donation, which is taxed at a 30 % tax rate.

It is possible that avoiding the increase in the capital gains tax will lead to a significant bear market in the coming two months in the United States, as investors rush to sell before the tax increases. Of course, if the fall in the share price exceeds the difference in the tax rate, it would not be to your advantage to sell.