Fascinating list of stocks predominantly owned by hedge funds, prepared by Goldman Sachs.
The Goldman Sachs 'Very Important Positions' list aggregates the top 50 positions held by hedge funds that utilize fundamental investment strategies.
Among those new additions to the list this quarter are: Tyco International (TYC), Cognizant Tech Solutions (CTSH), Barrick Gold (ABX), Viacom (VIA.B), Covidien (COV), Freeport McMoran (FCX), Covanta (CVA), Davita (DVA), Schlumberger (SLB), US Bancorp (USB), Halliburton (HAL) and General Electric (GE).
Several of them are gold and mining-related.
Wednesday, September 22, 2010
Wednesday, August 25, 2010
High-yield dividends
I came across this excellent note on companies with a high-yield in dividends.
Many of the companies are REIT or Business Development Companies (BDC), which are required to distribute most of their earnings in the form of dividends.
Among those mentioned are:
Company Yield %
PDL BioPharma (Nasdaq:PDLI) 16.89
Anworth Mortgage Asset Corporation (NYSE:ANH) 15.02
Annaly Capital Management (NYSE:NLY) 15.47
Frontier Communications Corporation (NYSE:FTR) 13.33
Alpine Total Dynamic Dividend (NYSE:AOD) 12.11
Apollo Investment Corporation (Nasdaq:AINV) 11.65
MFA Mortgage Investments (NYSE:MFA) 10.48
Another note has an interesting overview of the Business Development Companies.
Of particular interest, perhaps, Apollo Investment Corporation (AINV), which allows retail investors to invest in a quasi-private equity environment.
According to the Morningstar Equity Research Profile,
Many of the companies are REIT or Business Development Companies (BDC), which are required to distribute most of their earnings in the form of dividends.
Among those mentioned are:
Company Yield %
PDL BioPharma (Nasdaq:PDLI) 16.89
Anworth Mortgage Asset Corporation (NYSE:ANH) 15.02
Annaly Capital Management (NYSE:NLY) 15.47
Frontier Communications Corporation (NYSE:FTR) 13.33
Alpine Total Dynamic Dividend (NYSE:AOD) 12.11
Apollo Investment Corporation (Nasdaq:AINV) 11.65
MFA Mortgage Investments (NYSE:MFA) 10.48
Another note has an interesting overview of the Business Development Companies.
Business development companies are similar in some respects to a REIT in that they must pass on 90% of their income to shareholders. In addition BDCs may not place more than 5% of assets in one company, can't own more than 10% of the voting stock and can't invest more than 25% of their assets in companies that are considered to be in the same industry. This provides a modicum of diversification.
Of particular interest, perhaps, Apollo Investment Corporation (AINV), which allows retail investors to invest in a quasi-private equity environment.
According to the Morningstar Equity Research Profile,
Externally managed by the private-equity firm of the same
name, Apollo is a closed-end business-development
company that invests in the debt and equity issuances of
middle-market companies. Subordinated debt, second-lien
loans, equity, and preferred stock make up 58%, 26%, 13%,
and 3%, respectively, of its investment book.
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
Brazil is (probably) coming down
The iShares MSCI Brazil Index ETF (EWZ) is probably coming down.
It has already fallen from its 52 week high of 80.93 (reached in January) to 68.3 (with a fall of -1.7 % just yesterday).
However, it is still probably over-valued, for several reasons:
a) the Brazilian real is over-valued.
b) Emerging Market stock indices are over-valued in general, including Brazil's (the EEM Emerging Markets index ETF is down from 46.66 to 40.65 in the same period).
c) Many commodities that Brazil exports are over-valued (including agricultural and mineral products), and will probably fall in price given China's slowdown.
d) the Brazilian economy is slowing down, posting a negative growth (or fall) of -1.0 % in industrial production in June 2010 (the third consecutive fall).
e) Lula's handpicked successor, Dilma Rousseff, is gaining in the polls, and may prove to be more populist than Lula (particularly in economic policy).
Other than shorting EWZ, another way to benefit from this fall would be to buy ProShares Ultrashort MSCI Brazil (BZQ).
UPDATE: As of December 12, 2013, the iShares MSCI Brazil Index ETF (EWZ) has fallen to 43.8 (that is, almost half its level of January 2010). Almost all of the factors I mentioned in this 2010 post have come to pass, except that Dilma Rousseff actually has run a tighter policy than Lula. The HSBC Brazil Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) has slipped into contractionary territory. On the other hand, the Brazilian stock market seems to have been pummeled enough, and might be ready for a correction.
It has already fallen from its 52 week high of 80.93 (reached in January) to 68.3 (with a fall of -1.7 % just yesterday).
However, it is still probably over-valued, for several reasons:
a) the Brazilian real is over-valued.
b) Emerging Market stock indices are over-valued in general, including Brazil's (the EEM Emerging Markets index ETF is down from 46.66 to 40.65 in the same period).
c) Many commodities that Brazil exports are over-valued (including agricultural and mineral products), and will probably fall in price given China's slowdown.
d) the Brazilian economy is slowing down, posting a negative growth (or fall) of -1.0 % in industrial production in June 2010 (the third consecutive fall).
e) Lula's handpicked successor, Dilma Rousseff, is gaining in the polls, and may prove to be more populist than Lula (particularly in economic policy).
Other than shorting EWZ, another way to benefit from this fall would be to buy ProShares Ultrashort MSCI Brazil (BZQ).
UPDATE: As of December 12, 2013, the iShares MSCI Brazil Index ETF (EWZ) has fallen to 43.8 (that is, almost half its level of January 2010). Almost all of the factors I mentioned in this 2010 post have come to pass, except that Dilma Rousseff actually has run a tighter policy than Lula. The HSBC Brazil Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) has slipped into contractionary territory. On the other hand, the Brazilian stock market seems to have been pummeled enough, and might be ready for a correction.
Tuesday, June 22, 2010
Doing well by doing good
These three SICAV (the European equivalent of an ETF) offer the opportunity of obtaining a fairly good performance by investing in development-oriented and socially responsible funds.
1. responsAbility Global Microfinance Fund, ISIN: LU0180190273, has managed to have a positive return in each of the past five years!
Overall it is up an annual average of 3.83 % in the past five years; not much, but much better than the markets! The fund's objective, according to its fact sheet, is "To invest its assets in securities with which financial service companies in less developed countries are financed and/or refinanced".
2. CHOIX SOLIDAIRE (C) SICAV, FR0010177899.
This one has had a less smooth ride (2008 was a bummer year), but overall it has also achieved a positive return in the past 5 years (+3.11 %).
According to Google Translate (a great tool!), "The Fund aims to beat its benchmark (75% EONIA + 25% DJ Eurostoxx) by allocating diversified equity and fixed income products selected in consideration of ethical criteria".
Does being ethical mean never having to say you are sorry?
Here is a Guide to Ethical Investing. "These charts show that you don’t necessarily have to sacrifice investment performance when investing ethically", it claims.
3. DWS Invest Africa LC, LU0329759764.
After a very bumpy start, this fund that invests primarily in Africa has had a gangbusters ride. It's "Tax Year Return" was 78.9 %!
It's investment objective is: "At least 70% of the sub-fund’s total assets (after deduction of liquid assets) are invested in shares, share certificates, participation and dividend-right certificates, and equity warrants of issuers which have their registered offices or their principal business activity in Africa or which, as holding companies, hold the majority of interests in companies registered in Africa, particularly in South-Africa, Egypt, Mauritius, Nigeria, Morocco and Kenya".
Africa may be the flavor of the month, but if you consider that it is a Region that has a huge need for capital investments, and a long way to go in developing their capital markets, there are many opportunities ripe for the picking.
In any case, I would advise you to devote at least part of your portfolio to socially and environmentally sustainable investments (also known as SRI).
Here is the definition from EUROSIF: "Socially Responsible Investment (SRI) combines investors' financial objectives with their concerns about social, environmental, ethical (SEE) and corporate governance issues. SRI is an evolving movement and even the terminology is still very much in the evolving phase. Some SRI investors refer only to the SEE risks while others refer to ESG issues (Environmental, Social, Governance). Eurosif believes both are relevant to SRI. SRI is based on a growing awareness among investors, companies and governments about the impact that these risks may have on long-term issues ranging from sustainable development to long-term corporate performance".
Considering the recent BP oil spill, and the huge liabilities faced by tobacco and chemical companies, perhaps they have a point.
1. responsAbility Global Microfinance Fund, ISIN: LU0180190273, has managed to have a positive return in each of the past five years!
Overall it is up an annual average of 3.83 % in the past five years; not much, but much better than the markets! The fund's objective, according to its fact sheet, is "To invest its assets in securities with which financial service companies in less developed countries are financed and/or refinanced".
2. CHOIX SOLIDAIRE (C) SICAV, FR0010177899.
This one has had a less smooth ride (2008 was a bummer year), but overall it has also achieved a positive return in the past 5 years (+3.11 %).
According to Google Translate (a great tool!), "The Fund aims to beat its benchmark (75% EONIA + 25% DJ Eurostoxx) by allocating diversified equity and fixed income products selected in consideration of ethical criteria".
Does being ethical mean never having to say you are sorry?
Here is a Guide to Ethical Investing. "These charts show that you don’t necessarily have to sacrifice investment performance when investing ethically", it claims.
3. DWS Invest Africa LC, LU0329759764.
After a very bumpy start, this fund that invests primarily in Africa has had a gangbusters ride. It's "Tax Year Return" was 78.9 %!
It's investment objective is: "At least 70% of the sub-fund’s total assets (after deduction of liquid assets) are invested in shares, share certificates, participation and dividend-right certificates, and equity warrants of issuers which have their registered offices or their principal business activity in Africa or which, as holding companies, hold the majority of interests in companies registered in Africa, particularly in South-Africa, Egypt, Mauritius, Nigeria, Morocco and Kenya".
Africa may be the flavor of the month, but if you consider that it is a Region that has a huge need for capital investments, and a long way to go in developing their capital markets, there are many opportunities ripe for the picking.
In any case, I would advise you to devote at least part of your portfolio to socially and environmentally sustainable investments (also known as SRI).
Here is the definition from EUROSIF: "Socially Responsible Investment (SRI) combines investors' financial objectives with their concerns about social, environmental, ethical (SEE) and corporate governance issues. SRI is an evolving movement and even the terminology is still very much in the evolving phase. Some SRI investors refer only to the SEE risks while others refer to ESG issues (Environmental, Social, Governance). Eurosif believes both are relevant to SRI. SRI is based on a growing awareness among investors, companies and governments about the impact that these risks may have on long-term issues ranging from sustainable development to long-term corporate performance".
Considering the recent BP oil spill, and the huge liabilities faced by tobacco and chemical companies, perhaps they have a point.
Wednesday, May 26, 2010
Emerging Markets Index comes down, as predicted
In January, I had forecast that the EEM (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets) would "come down to at least 35 within the next 6 months".
As of this writing, it has come down to 36.9.
Feels good to be right :-)
As of this writing, it has come down to 36.9.
Feels good to be right :-)
Lithium stocks revving up
Lithium stocks have taken off, as forecast several months ago.
Rockwood Holdings - up from a low of 11.96 to 24.35 per share
Western Lithium - up from 0.53 to 0.95
Lithium One Inc. - up from 0.73 to 1.35
Lithium Corporation - up from 0.50 to 0.77
American Lithium - up from 0.31 to 0.88
With the Gulf of Mexico oil spill, continuing troubles in several oil-exporting countries, and the subsidies to green growth, hybrid and electrical-car related stocks should continue to do well.
Rockwood Holdings - up from a low of 11.96 to 24.35 per share
Western Lithium - up from 0.53 to 0.95
Lithium One Inc. - up from 0.73 to 1.35
Lithium Corporation - up from 0.50 to 0.77
American Lithium - up from 0.31 to 0.88
With the Gulf of Mexico oil spill, continuing troubles in several oil-exporting countries, and the subsidies to green growth, hybrid and electrical-car related stocks should continue to do well.
Wednesday, May 5, 2010
They ain't no fools
I am starting to believe that these Motley Fools are no fools.
Since I bought VMWARE and Akamai, based on their advise, they are up 40 and 83 %, respectively!
I think I am going to try to buy into their new mutual fund, FOOLX.
I had been thinking of buying some of the stocks they own any way, such as Berkshire Hathaway Inc. B (BRK.B) and Yum Brands, Inc. (YUM).
Since I bought VMWARE and Akamai, based on their advise, they are up 40 and 83 %, respectively!
I think I am going to try to buy into their new mutual fund, FOOLX.
I had been thinking of buying some of the stocks they own any way, such as Berkshire Hathaway Inc. B (BRK.B) and Yum Brands, Inc. (YUM).
Tuesday, February 16, 2010
Sobre el colapso de la economía argentina en el siglo XX
Escribi esta breve nota en respuesta a un comentario de un amigo:
- es cierto que la inestabilidad ha generado problemas en la conducción de la política económica, pero más grave aún ha sido la orientación de la misma (populismo económico). Esto ha llevado a la economía argentina a caer de la octava de mundo en 1900 al puesto No 84 en el 2008 (ingreso per capita en el 2008, ligeramente superior al de Panamá).
- Aquí una interesante comparación del crecimiento en Argentina y Australia: http://www.cei.gov.ar/revista/06/parte%204beng.pdf
- EL PIB per capita de Argentina no creció en absoluto entre 1975 y 2001.
- Este articulo de Isabel Sanz compara el crecimiento económico en Argentina, Australia y Canadá (http://www.ekh.lu.se/ehes/paper/IsabelSanz-mayo2007%20(2).pdf). Destaca que el PIB per cápita de Argentina superó a Canadá hacia 1900, y se aproximó al de Australia. El declive más pronunciado del PIB argentino se produjo tras 1950 (no coincidentemente, Perón tomo el poder en 1946).
- Para el 2008, los PIB per capita respectivos son: $41,730 para Canadá, $40,350 para Australia y $7,200 para Argentina (según el método Atlas; según el método de Paridad de Poder de Compra, $36,220 para Canadá, $ 34,040 para Australia; $14,020 para Argentina. (http://siteresources.worldbank.org/DATASTATISTICS/Resources/GNIPC.pdf)
- El artículo de Isabel Sanz, atribuye el colapso económico en Argentina al deterioro de un “índice de libertad económica reducido”, igualmente tras 1950 (y nuevamente en 1970-75; no coincidentemente, Perón y su esposa volvieron al poder en 1973-76). “This index consists of a series of macroeconomic variables – including the relative weight of public consumption compared with total consumption, the real depreciation rate of the currency, the level of nominal protection and the difference between the official and the market rates of exchange”.
- En términos generales, discrepo con quienes piensan que se puede “aumentar la competitividad” devaluando o depreciando el tipo de cambio. La productividad real solo aumenta mediante inversiones en capital físico y humano.
- La devaluación o depreciación monetaria se traduce, a mediano plazo, en mas inflación, y por ende no altera los precios relativos (excepto, quizás, puede disminuir los salarios reales y los ingresos erales de los pensionistas).
- Manejar un esquema de tipos de cambio múltiples es una receta para la catástrofe económica (demostrado, empíricamente, en el estudio de Sanz citado).
- es cierto que la inestabilidad ha generado problemas en la conducción de la política económica, pero más grave aún ha sido la orientación de la misma (populismo económico). Esto ha llevado a la economía argentina a caer de la octava de mundo en 1900 al puesto No 84 en el 2008 (ingreso per capita en el 2008, ligeramente superior al de Panamá).
- Aquí una interesante comparación del crecimiento en Argentina y Australia: http://www.cei.gov.ar/revista/06/parte%204beng.pdf
- EL PIB per capita de Argentina no creció en absoluto entre 1975 y 2001.
- Este articulo de Isabel Sanz compara el crecimiento económico en Argentina, Australia y Canadá (http://www.ekh.lu.se/ehes/paper/IsabelSanz-mayo2007%20(2).pdf). Destaca que el PIB per cápita de Argentina superó a Canadá hacia 1900, y se aproximó al de Australia. El declive más pronunciado del PIB argentino se produjo tras 1950 (no coincidentemente, Perón tomo el poder en 1946).
- Para el 2008, los PIB per capita respectivos son: $41,730 para Canadá, $40,350 para Australia y $7,200 para Argentina (según el método Atlas; según el método de Paridad de Poder de Compra, $36,220 para Canadá, $ 34,040 para Australia; $14,020 para Argentina. (http://siteresources.worldbank.org/DATASTATISTICS/Resources/GNIPC.pdf)
- El artículo de Isabel Sanz, atribuye el colapso económico en Argentina al deterioro de un “índice de libertad económica reducido”, igualmente tras 1950 (y nuevamente en 1970-75; no coincidentemente, Perón y su esposa volvieron al poder en 1973-76). “This index consists of a series of macroeconomic variables – including the relative weight of public consumption compared with total consumption, the real depreciation rate of the currency, the level of nominal protection and the difference between the official and the market rates of exchange”.
- En términos generales, discrepo con quienes piensan que se puede “aumentar la competitividad” devaluando o depreciando el tipo de cambio. La productividad real solo aumenta mediante inversiones en capital físico y humano.
- La devaluación o depreciación monetaria se traduce, a mediano plazo, en mas inflación, y por ende no altera los precios relativos (excepto, quizás, puede disminuir los salarios reales y los ingresos erales de los pensionistas).
- Manejar un esquema de tipos de cambio múltiples es una receta para la catástrofe económica (demostrado, empíricamente, en el estudio de Sanz citado).
The cointegration analysis carried out between this index for Argentina relative to Australia and Canada and the respective series of relative Argentinean GDP per capita lead us to the conclusion that Argentina’s comparative economic performance may have been shaped and caused by the different level of economic freedom present in this country throughout the period under consideration. Consequently, this study identifies macroeconomic results as being responsible for Argentina’s economic failure and her relative loss of ground.
Thursday, January 21, 2010
Donate to Haiti earthquake victims today
Please donate what you can to provide immediate and urgent assistance to the victims of the earthquakes in Haiti.
Some reputable organizations which are already working on the ground, are the following:
American Red Cross:
http://www.redcross.org/
(you can also receive frequent flyer miles on some airlines for your donation; for example:
http://american.redcross.org/americanairlines-pub)
Doctors without Borders:
https://donate.doctorswithoutborders.org/
Oxfam
http://www.oxfam.org/haitidonate
(through Facebook Causes: www.causes.com/haitiquake)
World Food Programme:
https://www.wfp.org/donate/haiti
(through Facebook Causes: www.causes.com/feedhaiti )
Give a loved one a Gift donation:
http://exchange.causes.com/
UN Foundation
http://www.unfoundation.org
Other options:
http://www.google.com/relief/haitiearthquake/
Find a charity with a proven track record of success in providing disaster relief and one that has worked in Haiti; avoid possible scams. Start with the list of charities on this list:
http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=content.view&cpid=1004
Detailed information about the emergency response available at:
http://www.reliefweb.int
Please donate what you can today!
Some reputable organizations which are already working on the ground, are the following:
American Red Cross:
http://www.redcross.org/
(you can also receive frequent flyer miles on some airlines for your donation; for example:
http://american.redcross.org/americanairlines-pub)
Doctors without Borders:
https://donate.doctorswithoutborders.org/
Oxfam
http://www.oxfam.org/haitidonate
(through Facebook Causes: www.causes.com/haitiquake)
World Food Programme:
https://www.wfp.org/donate/haiti
(through Facebook Causes: www.causes.com/feedhaiti )
Give a loved one a Gift donation:
http://exchange.causes.com/
UN Foundation
http://www.unfoundation.org
Other options:
http://www.google.com/relief/haitiearthquake/
Find a charity with a proven track record of success in providing disaster relief and one that has worked in Haiti; avoid possible scams. Start with the list of charities on this list:
http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=content.view&cpid=1004
Detailed information about the emergency response available at:
http://www.reliefweb.int
Please donate what you can today!
Tuesday, January 12, 2010
Ten money-making ideas (and comments)
In general, I like Marketwatch's "Ten money-making ideas for 2010", by Jonathan Burton.
A few comments:
1. Some asset classes are clearly entering into a bubble, as highlighted by The Economist in this week's cover story. This would include Chinese, Argentine and Brazilian stock markets, among other emerging markets.
2. I agree that some pharmaceutical stocks are undervalued, including Pfizer.
3. In contrast, some tech stocks are clearly overvalued, including Amazon, Apple and Google. I do like Microsoft, IBM and Oracle, as Mr. Burton does.
4. I always recommend "plain vanilla" index funds, such as those tracking the S&P 500.
5. Although oil prices have been rising in response to the cold front in most of the Northern hemisphere, this is probably not sustainable. Other indicators suggest that - the current freezing temperatures notwithstanding - 2010 should be the hottest year on record.
6. I do have to disagree with the "bullish sentiments" on the U.S. dollar. The sky-high deficits do not bode well for the greenback, and already it has fallen back compared to the euro and the yen.
7. I completely disagree with the advise on emerging market index funds (such as iShares MSCI Emerging Markets, EEM). This encapsulates the bubble in emerging market stocks, and will clearly collapse in the coming months. Currently, EEM is trading near its 52-week high of 43.47, and it should come down to at least 35 within the next 6 months.
The main problem with the note is that it does not factor in a very likely rise in inflation and interest rates (except in the recommendation to avoid long-term government bonds). Alternative investments, as mentioned before on this blog, are gold and other commodity ETFs, as well as TIPS (Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities), and some staple goods ETFs.
Happy New Decade!
A few comments:
1. Some asset classes are clearly entering into a bubble, as highlighted by The Economist in this week's cover story. This would include Chinese, Argentine and Brazilian stock markets, among other emerging markets.
2. I agree that some pharmaceutical stocks are undervalued, including Pfizer.
3. In contrast, some tech stocks are clearly overvalued, including Amazon, Apple and Google. I do like Microsoft, IBM and Oracle, as Mr. Burton does.
4. I always recommend "plain vanilla" index funds, such as those tracking the S&P 500.
5. Although oil prices have been rising in response to the cold front in most of the Northern hemisphere, this is probably not sustainable. Other indicators suggest that - the current freezing temperatures notwithstanding - 2010 should be the hottest year on record.
6. I do have to disagree with the "bullish sentiments" on the U.S. dollar. The sky-high deficits do not bode well for the greenback, and already it has fallen back compared to the euro and the yen.
7. I completely disagree with the advise on emerging market index funds (such as iShares MSCI Emerging Markets, EEM). This encapsulates the bubble in emerging market stocks, and will clearly collapse in the coming months. Currently, EEM is trading near its 52-week high of 43.47, and it should come down to at least 35 within the next 6 months.
The main problem with the note is that it does not factor in a very likely rise in inflation and interest rates (except in the recommendation to avoid long-term government bonds). Alternative investments, as mentioned before on this blog, are gold and other commodity ETFs, as well as TIPS (Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities), and some staple goods ETFs.
Happy New Decade!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
